END NOTES

Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

500. Notaires v. Delorme [1994] D.D.C.P. 287 (Tribunal des professions); Mallette v. Comité de déontologie policière, [1995] R.J.Q. 862 (C.S.).
501. Ontario (Human Rights Comm.) v. House (1994), 115 D.L.R (4th) 279 (Dist. Ct.); CIBA-Geigy Canada v. Canada (Patented Medicine Prices Review Board), [1994] 3 F.C. 425.
502. CUB 27404 (Marsh) Umpire Decision; CUB 10546 (Prentice) Umpire Decision; CUB 22207 (Adeodu: adequate documentation). Umpire Decision
503. CUB 10602 (Ramirez) Umpire Decision; CUB 22222 (Mazur) Umpire Decision; CUB 21910 (Lin: memos). Umpire Decision
504. CUB 15680 (Sicoli) Umpire Decision; CUB 15252 (Banks) Umpire Decision; CUB 13820 (Vanderheaghe) Umpire Decision; CUB 31164 (Bernardo) Umpire Decision; CUB 14196A (Post) Umpire Decision; CUB 22222 (Mazur: "The failure to cite balanced jurisprudence simply is not fair.") Umpire Decision; CUB 18060 (Young). Umpire Decision
505. CUB 15816 (Robinson). Umpire Decision
506. CUB 25228 (Snider) Umpire Decision; CUB 35722 (Roberts: 15 minutes before the hearing is insufficient). Umpire Decision
507. CUB 26146 (Porter). Umpire Decision
508. A-1677-92 (Désilets: true cause of voluntary departure) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-56-96 and Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal A-57-96 (Faucher: the three-part test for availability) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-450-95 (Bell: whether the victim has effectively been harassed) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-1598-92 (Easson: was it misconduct or voluntary departure) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-3-96 (Gagnon: showing of strike) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-236-94 (Jewell: proof of an instance of misconduct) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-1458-84 (Tanguay: proof of valid reason, not honourable motive) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-349-95 (West) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-366-94 (Jouan: essential issue of time devoted to business) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-1692-92 (Michael: disentitlement and the disqualification schemes) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-800-80 (Moura: good cause to refuse suitable employment). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
509. A-636-85 (Joseph) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-471-95 (Choinière) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-732-95 (Fakhari) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-130-96 (Meunier). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
510. A-600-94 (Gates) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 47735 (Carbonneau). Umpire Decision
511. A-714-88 (MacMillan) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-75-94 (Craig). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
512. CUB 29688 (Sears) Umpire Decision; CUB 30012 (Hayes). Umpire Decision
513. CUB 16791 (Wray) Umpire Decision; CUB 15680 (Sicoli) Umpire Decision; CUB 21943 (Hamonic) Umpire Decision; CUB 17649 (Fradette) Umpire Decision; CUB 24138 (Fredette) Umpire Decision; CUB 25506 (Au). Umpire Decision
514. CUB 26426 (Gyall) Umpire Decision; CUB 14876 (Hayes) Umpire Decision; CUB 2130 (Dewart) Umpire Decision; CUB 13838 (Ferenc) Umpire Decision; CUB 47902 (Bissiri: the board preferred hearsay evidence to direct testimony). Umpire Decision
515. CUB 13366 (McIvor) Umpire Decision; CUB 11346 (Nadeau) Umpire Decision; CUB 11746 (Bond) Umpire Decision; CUB 10720 (Wallace) Umpire Decision; CUB 21532 (Sabiston). Umpire Decision
516. CUB 12897 (Pulzoni) Umpire Decision; CUB 17307 (Introwski). Umpire Decision
517. A-418-97 (Childs). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
518. CUB 10726 (Farsad) Umpire Decision; CUB 17649 (Fradette): in this misconduct case, the Board should have required that the employer's representative be present in order to comment on the dismissal letter Umpire Decision; CUB 12430 (Smith). Umpire Decision
519. CUB 12281 (Liscombe). Umpire Decision
520. CUB 10674 (Dubuisson) Umpire Decision; A-1873-83 (Mills) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 11648 (Ingrouville). Umpire Decision
521. CUB 24777 (Wyder). Umpire Decision
522. Sopinka, Lederman and Bryant, c. 18; in Quebec, see art. 2818 C.C.Q.
523. It is not necessary to call the author of an affidavit as a witness: CUB 26487 (Pelletier). Umpire Decision
524. As with personal notes made by an officer of the Commission during a meeting with the claimant: A-44-91 (Harnish). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
525. CUB 19859 (Holditch) Umpire Decision; CUB 23897 (Mielke). Umpire Decision
526. CUB 11004 (Schiml). Umpire Decision
527. CUB 12732 (Smart). Umpire Decision
528. Royer, at 786; art. 2860 C.C.Q.
529. A-418-97 (Childs). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
530. T-1689-85 (Bacon) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 21911 (Lavigne-Lincourt). Umpire Decision
531. Royer, at 311-312.
532. CUB 28266 (Zmit). Umpire Decision
533. CUB 29257 (Hince). Umpire Decision
534. CUB 12341 (Bélanger). Umpire Decision
535. CUB 10071 (Drul: refusal to allow further witnesses to be called). Umpire Decision
536. CUB 19057 (Annesty). Umpire Decision
537. CUB 19057 (Annesty) Umpire Decision; CUB 17649 (Fradette) Umpire Decision; CUB 31523 (Morein). Umpire Decision
538. In one case, the Court of Appeal held the board "was not obliged to make subtle and needless distinctions between the direct and the indirect evidence": A-3-96 (R Gagnon). This position should not be regarded as the generally applicable one. In our opinion, the board must make the distinction and must be able to do so.
539. For example, "Is it not true that you applied for employment at Bombardier on January 5?" Examples of non-leading questioning: "Where did you apply for employment? On what date did you do so?"
540. "Personal" notes dictated by a lawyer or representative are apparently unreliable! The tribunal may look into them further.
541. Royer, at 322; Sopinka, Lederman and Bryant, at 920 et seq.
542. CUB 8741 (Louttit) Umpire Decision; CUB 10272 (Freake) Umpire Decision; CUB 39190 (Lalonde) Umpire Decision; CUB 16359 (St-Laurent) Umpire Decision; CUB 18671 (Lavoie) Umpire Decision; CUB 30578 (Lévesque) Umpire Decision; CUB 47426 (Deslandes) Umpire Decision; A-557-96 (Lévesque) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 45820 (Blouin). Umpire Decision
543. CUB 14876 (Hayes) Umpire Decision; CUB 12577 (Finlay) Umpire Decision; CUB 14000 (Brooks) Umpire Decision; CUB 25154 (Label) Umpire Decision; CUB 33677 (Deschênes) Umpire Decision; CUB 32454 (Gauthier). Umpire Decision
544. CUB 18330 (Nix) Umpire Decision; CUB 18126 (Vien Luong) Umpire Decision; CUB 29477 (Littleton) Umpire Decision; CUB 28569 (Suralvo) Umpire Decision; CUB 14876 (Hayes). Umpire Decision
545. CUB 34812 (Foster) Umpire Decision; CUB 4314 (Redding) Umpire Decision; CUB 12452 (Hjorleifson) Umpire Decision; CUB 3282 (Scott) Umpire Decision; CUB 12351A (Watson) Umpire Decision; A-378-96 (Lalonde) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-115-94 (Ash: board members were in the best position and had the best opportunity to assess the evidence and make findings with regard to credibility). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
546. CUB 24456 (Larkin). Umpire Decision
547. A-355-96 (Rancourt) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-270-96 (Boucher) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 12897 (Pulzoni) Umpire Decision; CUB 13366 (McIvor) Umpire Decision; CUB 10720 (Wallace) Umpire Decision; CUB 14849 (Craig) Umpire Decision; CUB 43153A (Purba: circumstantial evidence taken from documents contradicted by testimony that was not credible). Umpire Decision
548. CUB 17852 (Kingsman) Umpire Decision; CUB 43153A (Purba: "The Board, and it alone, is the trier of facts. I [the Umpire] am bound by its decision on credibility"). Umpire Decision
549. CUB 12430 (Smith: such a hearing was held to violate natural justice in that instance) Umpire Decision; CUB 11004 (Schiml). Umpire Decision
550. Garant, vol. 2, at 286 et seq.; A-308-81 (Olivier) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; see generally: Royer, at 329 et seq.; Sopinka, Lederman and Bryant, at 934 et seq.; CUB 36362 (Lamontagne: the Commission has the right to cross-examine the claimant). Umpire Decision
551. Mahenran v. Canada (M.E.I.) [1991] 134 N.R. 316 (F.C.A.); CUB 25678 (Margetish). Umpire Decision
552. CUB 39207 (Peter Murray: the Umpire was satisfied of this after hearing the tape of the hearing.) Umpire Decision
553. Y. Ouellette, at 365.
554. CUB 14852 (Jones) Umpire Decision; CUB 18783 (Macdougall) Umpire Decision; CUB 11721 (Kazibet) Umpire Decision; CUB 15818 (Catcheway) Umpire Decision; CUB 23802 (Connors) Umpire Decision; CUB 36362 (Lamontagne). Umpire Decision
5. A-640-93 (Dietrich). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
556. Sopinka, Lederman and Bryant, c. 19.53 to 97.
557. CUB 42412 (Radomsky). Umpire Decision
558. CUB 33837 (Galarneau) Umpire Decision; CUB 38909 (Dumais) Umpire Decision; CUB 10323 (Bourcier) Umpire Decision; CUB 30791 (Gatambwe) Umpire Decision; CUB 21407 (Frappier). Umpire Decision
559. T-1189-93 (Charest, 4/2/99: criminal court); CUB 33837" (Galarneau: Commission des normes du travail)." Umpire Decision
560. CUB 41230 (Donaldson). Umpire Decision
561. CUB 38615 (Bains). Umpire Decision
562. R. v. Burdett (1820), 106 E.R. 873 (K.B.). For Quebec, see Civil Code, art. 2846.
563. Longpré v. Thériault [1979] C.A. 258 at 262 (Lamer J.A.).
564. See generally, Sopinka, Lederman and Bryant, at 971-973.
565. A-80-95 (St-Coeur) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal A-511-95 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; and A-512-95 (Dupuis-Johnson) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-106-96 (B. Tremblay) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-451-85 (Crupi) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-425-85 (Bissonnette) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 38449 (Lavery) Umpire Decision; A-704-95 (Savarie) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-378-96 (Lalonde) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; A-1028-91 (Hamel). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
566. A-167-93 (Cameron Innes). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
567. CUB 39567 (L.L. Johnson). Umpire Decision
568. CUB 10387 (Crupi) Umpire Decision; CUB 23985 (Gall) Umpire Decision; A-178-86 (Côté) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 24276 (McLaughlin) Umpire Decision; CUB 20198 (Hamel: collective agreement). Umpire Decision
569. CUB 12970 (Vigneault) Umpire Decision; A-527-87 (Giroux) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal; CUB 24632 (Jouan). Umpire Decision
570. P.A. Côté, Interprétation des lois, 3rd ed. (Cowansville: Yvon Blais), 1999, at 5 and 358.
571. Hills v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 513. Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada
572. A-167-93 (Cameron Innes). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
573. A-1132-84 (Douglas Garland); cited from Attorney-General v. Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover, [1957] A.C. 436 at 463 (H.L.). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
574. For example: A-136-96 (Caron-Bernier). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
575. See Canadian National Railway v. Canada, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114 ("every enactment is deemed remedial").
576. Canadian Pacific v. Canada (A.G.), [1986] 1 S.C.R. 678 (Unemployment Insurance Act).
577. A-80-95 (St-Cœur). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
578. Garant, vol. 1, at 389 et seq.: The Supreme Court and Federal Court have held that the label is of little importance even if the term "regulation" is employed most of the time. A guide or instruction can be a true regulation if it falls within the essential definition.
579. The same applies to other directives the Commission might issue: T-615-92 (Burke 7/6/94). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
580. Driedger, Construction of Statutes, 2d ed. (1983), quoted in Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27 at 41. Recent cases which have cited the above passage with approval include R. v. Hydro-Québec, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 213 Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada; Royal Bank of Canada v. Sparrow Electric Corp., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 411 Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada; Verdun v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 550 Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada; and Friesen v. Canada, [1995] 3 S.C.R. 103. Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada; In addition, see A-1132-84 (Douglas Garland) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal and A-167-93 (Cameron Innes). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
581. Grey v. Pearson (1857), 6 H.L.C. 60 at 104, as paraphrased in CUB 38323 (T. Benoît). Umpire Decision
582. Vachon v. CEIC, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 417.
583. R. v. Sommerville [1974] S.C.R. 387 at 395.
584. R. v. Sunny Brae (Town) Assessors, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 76 at 97; A-511-95 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal and A-512-95 (Dupuis-Johnson). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
585. Côté, at 388; Driedger, at 163; A-106-96 (B. Tremblay). Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
586. R. v. Sommerville, [1974] S.C.R. 387, at 390.
587. CUB 38323 (T.J. Benoît). Umpire Decision
588. Garant, vol 2, at 345; C.A.S. v. Tremblay, [1989] R.J.Q. 2053, 2074 (C.A.Q.), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 952, at 965. Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada
589. Garba v. Lajeunesse [1979] 1 F.C. 723 at 727; Grewal v. Canada (M.E.I.) [1992] F.C. 581 (F.C.A.).
590. Tremblay v. Québec (Commission des affaires sociales), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 952 at 957 (per Gonthier J.). Judgement Of The Supreme Court Of Canada
591. Ibid. See also IWA v. Consolidated Bathurst.
592. Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons, [1992] 76 C.C.C. (3d) 10 (Ont. C.A.).
593. Ibid. at 42.
594. Khan, supra, at 40.
595. Spring v. Law Society of Upper Canada [1988], 64 O.R. (2d) 719 (Div. Ct.).
596. Després v. New Brunswick Lands Surveyors Association, [1992] 8 Admin. L.R. (2d) 136 (N.B.C.A.).
597. Sawyer v. Ontario Racing Commission, [1979] 24 O.R. (2d) 673 (C.A.).
598. Bovbel v. Canada (M.E.I.), [1994] 2 F.C. 563 (F.C.A.); Weerasinge v. Canada (M.E.I.), [1994] 1 F.C. 330 (F.C.A.) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal.
599. T-615-92 (Burke) where the Federal Court of Appeal had referred the matter back to the Commission so the Director could decide quasi-judicially: Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal A-205-89 (Burke) Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal

[ notes 4 | table of contents | notes 6 ]