CHAPTER 1

Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, please contact us to request an alternate format.

ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE AND TRIBUNAL PROCEEDINGS

 

1.1 General Characteristics of Administrative Proceedings

1.1.1 The Board is a Tribunal

1.1.1.6 Rehearing or Self-Review

In principle in our law, when a tribunal has rendered a decision, it no longer has responsibility for the case; it is functus officio and may accordingly no longer have anything to do with the decision, with a few exceptions. First, this may be explicitly permitted under the Act, as is the case in A. 120 Employment Insurance Act. On the other hand, the Supreme Court has ruled that although the Act does not permit this, an administrative tribunal may reopen a case in the interests of justice, hold a regular hearing if it realizes that it has made an error that has the effect of nullifying its decision, or if it failed to rule on a question.84 Citation 84 However, this does not have to involve a kind of relief "which would otherwise be available on appeal".85 Citation 85 Since the appeal to the Umpire provided for in s. 115 Employment Insurance Act clearly covers these cases, A. 120 should be strictly followed in this regard.

The case law also recognizes that an administrative tribunal can always correct material errors or errors that are the result of a lapse or an accidental omission.86 Citation 86

Finally, s. A. 117 Employment Insurance Act provides for a new hearing when this is requested by the Umpire, and the hearing shall be held in accordance with such directions as the Umpire considers appropriate. Strictly speaking, this is not a review or a rehearing but rather a new hearing that may be required before the same Board of Referees or a different board in accordance with the Umpire's directions.

In what cases will a rehearing be held under s. A. 120? These are situations where:

  • new facts are presented;
  • it is alleged that the decision was rendered before a material fact became known; or
  • it is alleged that the decision was based on an error concerning a material fact.

We shall come back to this point later in Chapter 5.

 

[ previous Previous page  | table of contents  | next Next page  ]